1994 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i 16V 4WD (125 Hp) 1994Overall Score62.25/100
1994 Mazda Cronos vs 1994 Seat Toledo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 2.0 i 16V (150 Hp) 1994Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationSeat Toledo
MazdaMakeSeat
CronosModelToledo
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationSeat Toledo
—0–100 km/h8,4 s
192 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
173 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationSeat Toledo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationSeat Toledo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationSeat Toledo
4695 mmLength4321 mm
1770 mmWidth1662 mm
1400 mmHeight1424 mm
1260 KgWeight1150 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2475 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Mazda Cronos and 1994 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…