1994 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0 D (82 Hp) 1994Overall Score58.25/100
1994 Mazda Cronos vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0 (100 Hp) 1994Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
CronosModelOmega
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationOpel Omega
161 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
82 HPPower100 HP
182 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationOpel Omega
4695 mmLength4740 mm
1770 mmWidth1760 mm
1400 mmHeight1445 mm
1260 KgWeight—
2610 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Mazda Cronos and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…