DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Mazda Cronos vs 1993 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSaturn
CronosModelSL
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

161 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
82 HPPower100 HP
182 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank49 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size175/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4478 mm
1770 mmWidth1718 mm
1400 mmHeight1334 mm
1260 KgWeight1054 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Mazda Cronos and 1993 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…