DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Mazda Cronos vs 1993 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
CronosModelSierra
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

161 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
82 HPPower105 HP
182 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4425 mm
1770 mmWidth1694 mm
1400 mmHeight1407 mm
1260 KgWeight—
2610 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Mazda Cronos and 1993 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…