DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Mazda Cronos vs 1993 Honda CRX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
CronosModelCRX
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
157 NmTorque150 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size195/60 R14 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4005 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1255 mm
1170 KgWeight1110 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Mazda Cronos and 1993 Honda CRX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…