DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Mazda Cronos vs 1991 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
CronosModelCresta
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
157 NmTorque194 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R14 89 STyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4695 mmLength—
1770 mmWidth—
1400 mmHeight—
1170 KgWeight—
2610 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Mazda Cronos and 1991 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…