DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda Clef vs 1994 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
ClefModelContour
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower165 HP
224 NmTorque217 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R14 91 HTyre size195/65 R14V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4658 mm
1750 mmWidth1749 mm
1400 mmHeight1374 mm
1250 KgWeight1400 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda Clef and 1994 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…