1996 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V 4WD (52 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Mazda Carol vs 2000 Mitsubishi Minica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Minica
Mitsubishi Minica 0.7 i 12V 4WD (50 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Minica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CarolModelMinica
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
52 HPPower50 HP
60 NmTorque62 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
155/70 R12 75 STyre size135/80 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
3290 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1425 mmHeight1510 mm
670 KgWeight750 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2340 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Carol and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Minica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…