1996 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V 4WD (52 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Mazda Carol vs 2000 Mazda Carol Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V (54 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Carol
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Carol
MazdaMakeMazda
CarolModelCarol
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Carol
0 km/hTop speed140 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement658 cc
52 HPPower54 HP
60 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Carol
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Carol
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12 75 STyre size155/65 R13 75 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Carol
3290 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1425 mmHeight1450 mm
670 KgWeight630 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Carol and 2000 Mazda Carol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Carol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…