DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Carol vs 1998 Subaru Pleo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Carol

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
CarolModelPleo
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3/5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed130 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement658 cc
46 HPPower45 HP
57 NmTorque56 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Urban consumption7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13 75 STyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1450 mmHeight1580 mm
680 KgWeight770 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2310 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Carol and 1998 Subaru Pleo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Carol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…