2000 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V (46 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Carol vs 1997 Mitsubishi Minica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mitsubishi
Minica
Mitsubishi Minica 0.66 CE (40 Hp) 1997Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Carol
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CarolModelMinica
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3/5Doors3
Performance
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
0 km/hTop speed110 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
46 HPPower40 HP
57 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Average consumption4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/65 R13 75 STyre size145/65 R13 R
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CarolSpecificationMitsubishi Minica
3395 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1450 mmHeight1475 mm
680 KgWeight650 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Carol and 1997 Mitsubishi Minica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Carol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…