2000 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V (46 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Carol vs 1998 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1998Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Carol
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Scrum
MazdaMakeMazda
CarolModelScrum
2000Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
3/5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Scrum
0 km/hTop speed125 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
46 HPPower42 HP
57 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Scrum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13 75 STyre size145/80 R12 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CarolSpecificationMazda Scrum
3395 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1450 mmHeight1870 mm
680 KgWeight780 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Carol and 1998 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Carol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…