DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda Capella vs 2002 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSkoda
CapellaModelSuperb
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeLiftback
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed219 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
200 HPPower155 HP
224 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption10,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4665 mmLength4803 mm
1965 mmWidth1765 mm
1510 mmHeight1469 mm
1320 KgWeight1250 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2803 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda Capella and 2002 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…