DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
CapellaModelCarnival
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
200 HPPower175 HP
224 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4665 mmLength4890 mm
1965 mmWidth1900 mm
1510 mmHeight1730 mm
1320 KgWeight1735 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…