DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda Capella vs 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
CapellaModelCavalier
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
140 HPPower141 HP
186 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4580 mm
1695 mmWidth1712 mm
1440 mmHeight1351 mm
1210 KgWeight1215 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda Capella and 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…