DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSuzuki
CapellaModelGrand Vitara
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower92 HP
230 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength3810 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1440 mmHeight1690 mm
1210 KgWeight1200 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…