DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Mercury Tracer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMercury
CapellaModelTracer
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
101 HPPower111 HP
230 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4440 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1440 mmHeight1350 mm
1210 KgWeight1115 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…