DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
CapellaModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,4 s
0 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
101 HPPower112 HP
230 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/80 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4368 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1440 mmHeight1708 mm
1210 KgWeight1565 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…