DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Capella vs 1996 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
CapellaModelZ3
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
114 HPPower115 HP
161 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CapellaSpecificationBMW Z3
4595 mmLength4025 mm
1695 mmWidth1692 mm
1395 mmHeight1288 mm
1160 KgWeight1160 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Capella and 1996 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…