2002 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Mazda Capella vs 2002 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
CapellaModel25
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover 25
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
0 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
175/70 R14Tyre size185/55 R15 H
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover 25
4575 mmLength3990 mm
1695 mmWidth1688 mm
1440 mmHeight1419 mm
1210 KgWeight1135 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda Capella and 2002 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…