2001 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.5 i (160 Hp) 2001Overall Score65.5/100
2001 Mazda Bongo vs 2001 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2001Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Mazda Bongo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
BongoModelOmega
2001Model year2001
MinivanBody typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationOpel Omega
—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
211 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationOpel Omega
4585 mmLength4898 mm
1690 mmWidth1775 mm
1960 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1610 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Mazda Bongo and 2001 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…