DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Bongo vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Bongo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
BongoModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
160 HPPower177 HP
211 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears4
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4433 mm
1690 mmWidth1809 mm
1960 mmHeight1709 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Bongo and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…