1997 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.5 D (120 Hp) 1997Overall Score63.75/100
1997 Mazda Bongo vs 1997 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 1.8 i 16V GS (126 Hp) 1997Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi FTO
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
BongoModelFTO
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeCoupe
—Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
120 HPPower126 HP
310 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption17,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationMitsubishi FTO
4585 mmLength4320 mm
1690 mmWidth1735 mm
1960 mmHeight1300 mm
—Weight1100 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Mazda Bongo and 1997 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…