DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda Bongo vs 1999 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
BongoModelXsara
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
71 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength4167 mm
1630 mmWidth1698 mm
1970 mmHeight1405 mm
—Weight1100 Kg
2220 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda Bongo and 1999 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…