1992 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 D (71 Hp) 1992Overall Score51.5/100
1992 Mazda Bongo vs 1993 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1993Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationFiat Croma
MazdaMakeFiat
BongoModelCroma
1992Model year1993
MinivanBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationFiat Croma
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
71 HPPower94 HP
128 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationFiat Croma
DieselFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationFiat Croma
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationFiat Croma
4230 mmLength4520 mm
1630 mmWidth1760 mm
1970 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1240 Kg
2220 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Mazda Bongo and 1993 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…