DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda Bongo vs 1992 Mercury Tracer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Tracer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMercury
BongoModelTracer
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1859 cc
82 HPPower88 HP
152 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank50 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength4341 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1970 mmHeight1338 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
2220 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda Bongo and 1992 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…