1999 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 (105 Hp) 1999Overall Score58.5/100
1999 Mazda Bongo vs 1999 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 1999Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Bongo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
MazdaMakeLand Rover
BongoModelFreelander
1999Model year1999
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
105 HPPower117 HP
162 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4585 mmLength4368 mm
1690 mmWidth1809 mm
1960 mmHeight1708 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Bongo and 1999 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Bongo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…