DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda Az-wagon vs 2003 Subaru R2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru R2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
Az-wagonModelR2
1999Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

140 km/hTop speed0 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
106 NmTorque84 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size155/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1690 mmHeight1520 mm
750 KgWeight770 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda Az-wagon and 2003 Subaru R2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru R2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…