DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda Az-wagon vs 2000 Mitsubishi Minica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Minica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
Az-wagonModelMinica
1998Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
52 HPPower50 HP
60 NmTorque62 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size135/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1690 mmHeight1510 mm
750 KgWeight750 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda Az-wagon and 2000 Mitsubishi Minica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Minica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…