DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda Az-wagon vs 2000 Honda Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Z

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
Az-wagonModelZ
1998Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

125 km/hTop speed130 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement656 cc
52 HPPower52 HP
60 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank35 lt
8 ltUrban consumption10 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
155/65 R13Tyre size175/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1690 mmHeight1675 mm
750 KgWeight960 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda Az-wagon and 2000 Honda Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…