DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Az-offroad vs 1999 Mazda Az-wagon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Az-offroad

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
Az-offroadModelAz-wagon
2003Model year1999
EstateBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
3Doors3/5

Performance

125 km/hTop speed140 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement658 cc
64 HPPower64 HP
106 NmTorque106 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank30 lt
12 ltUrban consumption8 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R16Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3395 mm
1475 mmWidth1475 mm
1680 mmHeight1690 mm
960 KgWeight750 Kg
2250 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Az-offroad and 1999 Mazda Az-wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Az-offroad leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…