2004 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.0 i 16V (145 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
2004 Mazda Atenza vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
AtenzaModelV50
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo V50
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
184 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo V50
4745 mmLength4522 mm
1780 mmWidth1845 mm
1440 mmHeight1457 mm
1375 KgWeight1472 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda Atenza and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSVolvo V50 vs Mazda Atenza2004 and 2004 model years
VSChevrolet Cavalier vs Mazda Atenza2004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSChevrolet Classic vs Mazda Atenza2004 and 2004 model years
VSMercedes-Benz Vaneo vs Mazda Atenza2004 and 2004 model years
VSFord Focus vs Mazda Atenza2004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…