DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mazda 929 vs 1990 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 929SpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
929ModelOmega
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 929SpecificationOpel Omega
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower100 HP
231 NmTorque158 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 929SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 929SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 929SpecificationOpel Omega
4690 mmLength4770 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1425 mmHeight1480 mm
1420 KgWeight1265 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mazda 929 and 1990 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…