DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mazda 626 vs 1997 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHolden
626ModelFrontera
1997Model year1997
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
182 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14 88 STyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4600 mmLength4192 mm
1690 mmWidth1780 mm
1465 mmHeight1721 mm
1230 KgWeight1828 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mazda 626 and 1997 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…