DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda 626 vs 1998 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
626ModelDiscovery
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
185 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
101 HPPower111 HP
220 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank89 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4524 mm
1710 mmWidth1810 mm
1430 mmHeight1960 mm
1275 KgWeight2020 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda 626 and 1998 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…