1998 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 i (90 Hp) 1998Overall Score49.25/100
1998 Mazda 626 vs 1998 Ford Galaxy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1998Overall Score48.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Galaxy
MazdaMakeFord
626ModelGalaxy
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Galaxy
11,9 s0–100 km/h17,1 s
171 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
153 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Galaxy
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Galaxy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 88 STyre size195/65R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationFord Galaxy
4600 mmLength4641 mm
1690 mmWidth1810 mm
1465 mmHeight1732 mm
1205 KgWeight1670 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Mazda 626 and 1998 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…