DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mazda 626 vs 2001 Peugeot 406 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points.

58.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakePeugeot
626Model406
1997Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
208 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
136 HPPower133 HP
181 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4600 mm
1710 mmWidth1765 mm
1430 mmHeight1400 mm
1250 KgWeight1410 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mazda 626 and 2001 Peugeot 406 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…