DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda 626 vs 1998 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationSaab 9-3
MazdaMakeSaab
626Model9-3
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
170 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank68 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationSaab 9-3
4574 mmLength4629 mm
1710 mmWidth1711 mm
1430 mmHeight1428 mm
1185 KgWeight1295 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda 626 and 1998 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…