DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 626 vs 2002 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSkoda
626ModelFabia
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
182 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
152 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 88HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength3960 mm
1710 mmWidth1645 mm
1430 mmHeight1450 mm
1180 KgWeight1155 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 626 and 2002 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…