DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 626 vs 1996 Seat Cordoba Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSeat
626ModelCordoba
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
155 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 88 HTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4109 mm
1750 mmWidth1640 mm
1400 mmHeight1408 mm
1150 KgWeight1055 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 626 and 1996 Seat Cordoba approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…