1997 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.8 (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score51.5/100
1997 Mazda 626 vs 1997 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.9 dTi (98 Hp) 1997Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Renault Megane
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Megane
MazdaMakeRenault
626ModelMegane
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Megane
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Megane
—Length4129 mm
—Width1699 mm
—Height1420 mm
—Weight1115 Kg
—Wheelbase2580 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Mazda 626 and 1997 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…