DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 626 vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
MazdaMakeAudi
626Model80
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
—Length4482 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1406 mm
—Weight1190 Kg
—Wheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 626 and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…