2000 • AC
Aceca
AC Aceca 4.6 i V8 32V (326 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
2000 AC Aceca vs 2000 Lincoln Mark Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Lincoln
Mark
Lincoln Mark 4.6 i V8 32V (284 Hp) 2000Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
AC Aceca
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Mark
ACMakeLincoln
AcecaModelMark
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats4
3Doors2
Performance
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Mark
6,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
326 HPPower284 HP
427 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Mark
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Mark
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/55 R18Tyre size255/60 R16 V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln Mark
4660 mmLength5255 mm
1890 mmWidth1895 mm
1340 mmHeight1360 mm
1615 KgWeight1400 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 AC Aceca and 2000 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…