DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC Aceca vs 1995 Alpina B8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Aceca

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B8
ACMakeAlpina
AcecaModelB8
2000Model year1995
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
3Doors2

Performance

AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B8
6,1 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed281 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
326 HPPower333 HP
427 NmTorque470 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B8
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank95 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B8
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R18Tyre size235/40 ZR 17; 265/35 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC AcecaSpecificationAlpina B8
4660 mmLength4433 mm
1890 mmWidth1710 mm
1340 mmHeight1346 mm
1615 KgWeight1500 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC Aceca and 1995 Alpina B8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Aceca leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…