DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mazda 626 vs 1997 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
626ModelScenic
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
191 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
155 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4134 mm
1750 mmWidth1719 mm
1390 mmHeight1675 mm
1180 KgWeight1290 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mazda 626 and 1997 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…