DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Mazda 626 vs 1990 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 90
MazdaMakeAudi
626Model90
1991Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 90
10,1 s0–100 km/h14,6 s
191 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
105 HPPower80 HP
155 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 90
4695 mmLength4393 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1397 mm
1180 KgWeight1090 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Mazda 626 and 1990 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…