DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Ford Escape Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Escape
MazdaMakeFord
6ModelEscape
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Escape
8,4 s0–100 km/h—
218 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
170 HPPower145 HP
226 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Escape
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Escape
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Escape
4765 mmLength4480 mm
1795 mmWidth1845 mm
1490 mmHeight1730 mm
1485 KgWeight1605 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…