2011 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.5i (170 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.5/100
2011 Mazda 6 vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 D DRIVe (175 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC70
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelXC70
2011Model year2010
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC70
8,4 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
218 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
170 HPPower175 HP
226 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC70
4765 mmLength4838 mm
1795 mmWidth1861 mm
1490 mmHeight1604 mm
1485 KgWeight1742 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda 6 and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…