DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda 6 vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
6ModelFreelander
2007Model year2006
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
218 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
226 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4433 mm
1795 mmWidth1809 mm
1490 mmHeight1709 mm
1485 KgWeight1550 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda 6 and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…