2002 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.3 (166 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Mazda 6 vs 2002 SsangYong Rexton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • SsangYong
Rexton
SsangYong Rexton 2002Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
SsangYong Rexton
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
MazdaMakeSsangYong
6ModelRexton
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
166 HPPower143 HP
207 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/45 R17 VTyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
4700 mmLength4720 mm
1780 mmWidth1870 mm
1480 mmHeight1760 mm
1390 KgWeight1815 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2828 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda 6 and 2002 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…